Monday, October 31, 2022

Home Secretary's hate speech against vegetarians

Note since writing this about 10 days ago, the home secretary was sacked (for a data security breach / leak), the prime minister resigned (failed to deliver on the proposed economic policy?), a new prime minister was appointed (the same person the Tory membership just rejected?) and then the home secretary was re-imstated in the role she was just sacked from for a security breach) ...

This morning, when this House of Commons speech popup on my instagram feed I was shocked


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/video/2022/oct/18/suella-braverman-blames-guardian-reading-tofu-eating-wokerati-for-disruptive-protests-video


I'm not even sure what wokerati means, is it even a word? 

But what was clear to me as Suella Braverman smacked the table to drill home her attack on vegetarians, was that this vitriol wasn't remotely funny nor good humoured, what I heard in her voice was fear.


Reviewing Suella Braverman's wikipage (details below), she was educated as Cambridge and Sorbonne (Paris), is a Barrister and has held an impressive number of highest offices in the land. 


Putting aside the merits of vegetarian diets and/or eating less meat, personally I believe that given the standard western diet, eating significantly less meat is good for the health and the environment ie win-win. Furthermore, as one gets used to eating less meat, our taste buds adjust and personally I find fresh fruit and veggies delicious, better even than the traditional meat-rich diet I was brought up on.


However irrespective of my personal beliefs, Suella Braverman's attack on vegetarians would be totally unacceptable at any work place I've been in for the last couple of decades and seems almost form of hate speech to me. Her excessively angry and aggressive tone really shocked me.


It appears Suella Braverman is no longer Home Secretary, not sure if this was her final house House of Commons speech?




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suella_Braverman



Home Secretary

In office

6 September 2022 – 19 October 2022

Prime Minister

Liz Truss

Preceded by

Priti Patel

Succeeded by

Grant Shapps

Attorney General for England and Wales

Advocate General for Northern Ireland

In office

13 February 2020 – 6 September 2022[a]

Prime Minister

Boris Johnson

Preceded by

Geoffrey Cox

Succeeded by

Michael Ellis

Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union

In office

9 January 2018 – 15 November 2018

Prime Minister

Theresa May

Preceded by

Office established

Succeeded by

Kwasi Kwarteng

Chair of the European Research Group

In office

19 June 2017 – 9 January 2018

Deputy

Michael Tomlinson

Party Leader

Theresa May

Preceded by

Steve Baker

Succeeded by

Jacob Rees-Mogg

Deputy Chair of the European Research Group

In office

20 November 2016 – 19 June 2017

Serving with Michael Tomlinson

Chair

Steve Baker

Party Leader

Theresa May

Preceded by

Office established

Succeeded by

Michael Tomlinson

Member of Parliament

for Fareham

Incumbent

Assumed office

7 May 2015

Preceded by

Mark Hoban

Majority

26,086 (45.6%)

Personal details

Born

Sue-Ellen Cassiana Fernandes

3 April 1980 (age 42)

Harrow, London, England

Political party

Conservative

Spouse

Rael Braverman ​(m. 2018)​

Children

2

Alma mater



Wednesday, October 5, 2022

Scratching the underbelly of Jane Austen subculture


I originally wanted to call this blog post:

Fanny Price vs Mary Crawford and scratching the underbelly of Jane Austen subcultures

but that is too long and so went for the short

Scratching the underbelly of Jane Austen subculture

The strange thing is, that people I usually like and agree with i.e. are on the "same wavelength" I find myself passionately disagreeing with regarding Fanny Price and Mary Crawford: the heroine and anti-heroine of Jane Austen's possibly most controversial novel Mansfield Park.  My personal favourite with Emma i.e. I enjoy both more than Austen's most acclaimed novel Pride & Prejudice? 

Fanny Price is a character whom I greatly admire: with her inner strength, self-discipline and ultimately her incredible self-belief, she ultimately triumphs, although it is a long slog for both Fanny and the reader.

However Fanny is quite probably Jane Austen's "least favourite heroine" with Janeites (*) i.e. the sort of people who repeatedly read Austen, watch all the adaptions (good and bad) and/or join online Austen discussion groups… you get the picture.

Personally, I slightly struggle with Lizzy Bennett and the fairy-tale ending of Pride & Prejudice, yes it is a wonderful novel and an absolute romantic classic, but I'm not quite as satisfied with the fairy tale ending. 

Intriguingly Mary Crawford might satisfy/fill some of this gap; in many ways her quick wit and charm, make her seem a bit like Lizzy Bennett (Austen's most popular heroine from Pride & Prejudice). Still, ultimately she is overly ambitious, somewhat manipulative and overly self-confident. Not 100% surprisingly given Jane Austen's personal beliefs and faith; things never quite work out for Mary Crawford in Mansfield Park. Possibly Mary Crawford is an antidote to the overly saccharine fairy tale ending for Lizzy Bennett.

I'm also intrigued by parallels between Fanny and Anne Elliot, the very popular heroine (especially with seasoned Janeites). Both heroines are reserved, and stoical, whom eventually, after displaying a great deal of inner strength, self-discipline, and good judgement; both find their "true love". These two later novels, seem richer and even more revealing portraits of society to me. But why is Anne much more popular than Fanny? Fanny starts Manfield Park as the poor relative and is patronized plus heavily condescended to, but eventually makes good. Anne Elliot is an admirable character, but it is not as clear why she lets her family treat her in a condescending manner?

NB (*) Here is how the BBC describes modern Janeites

Some Janeites, as they call themselves, write their own fiction imagining the marital exploits of Mr and Mrs Darcy. Others don elaborate period dress and throw Jane Austen-themed tea parties and balls.

Blogs and forums dedicated to Austen and Austen-style fan fiction abound across the internet. The Jane Austen Society of North America (Jasna) boasts 4,500 members and no fewer than 65 branches. 

https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-21036818

 

 



https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-21036818


Wednesday, August 31, 2022

Homage to Catalonia

After 12+ years in Amsterdam, my husband Thomas and I moved to Barcelona (well Badalona actually) this month. 

Living by a beautiful beach and swimming with fish in brilliant blue waters is a bit of a dream, but leaving Amsterdam was slightly heartbreaking.

For English classics, still my favourite genre of books, we read George Orwell's "Homage to Catalonia" coupled with another non-fiction, political, memoir: "Down and Out in Paris and London".

I like Orwell's progressive views and vision for social democracy:

 "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism, as I understand it."   

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homage_to_Catalonia#cite_note-1


Orwell's thinking was clearly ahead of many on the left, especially Sartre, who was intoxicated by Soviet propoganda until much later (1956 Hungarian invasion).

It was a good conversation last night, parallels to Jack London, the superb quality of writing: characterization, details of city life in Barcelona, Paris and London, details of squalor, mental and physical challenges of an infantryman.

We also discussed parallels to Roald Dahl's "War: Tales of Conflict and Strife" which we also read a few years ago. The first part of this new collection of Roald Dahl's works is his autobiographical Going Solo: a fantastic if slightly fanciful tale, at times Dahl seems to have a slightly romantic view of empire whereas Orwell is under no illusions about the economic realities of empire: 

Orwell's father was Richard Walmesley Blair, who worked as a Sub-Deputy Opium Agent in the Opium Department of the Indian Civil Service 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Orwell#Early_years

It was nice that we had a local Barcelona join the Amsterdam book club (hybrid online and in-person) and add a bit of local history. 

I'm keen to explore Barcelona, a beautiful city with a very rich history and also some amazing beaches.

Sunday, July 31, 2022

Persuasion or The Bride of Frankenstein - distinctly discombobulating

 The new Netflix 2022 Persuasion has been out for a week and has been ravaged by the critics.

In my opinion, it is mildly entertaining, a bit annoying in parts, and occasionally toe-curling embarrassing: still mostly an easy and intriguing watch. 

So mixed feelings on my side, I want to start by unpacking my problems with the film:

Stylistically it seems a bit of an odd mashup, I’ve only ever watched about 10 minutes of the hugely popular Bridgerton, but this Persuasion adaptation immediately made me think of Bridgerton. I don’t have a problem with Bridgerton, it is just I’m not into films and drama on the small screen. But I do want to give Bridgerton another go at some stage. 

I quite like the use of multiracial cast in Persuasion, it doesn’t seem historically accurate, but I particularly enjoyed the Nigerian-British actress Nikki Amuka-Bird, who played Lady Russel beautifully, one of several minor characters I thought this version of Persuasion portrayed nicely. The stylistic problems were the modernisation of the dialogue, lots of modern parlances, talking directly to the camera and a big dumbing down on Austen’s delightful dialogue, detailed descriptions, dry humour and inventive use of English. This was annoying.

There are a couple of toe-curling moments in the film. I struggle to imagine Jane Austen writing a scene with Anne Eliot struggling with peeing in public, behind a tree while she eavesdrops on Captain Wentworth & Louisa’s flirtatious small talk. Anne struggles with her ridiculous Georgian costume, which is absolutely unsuitable for peeing in public. Jane Austen’s humor could be quite near the knuckle, with the infamous reference to gay sex in the navy: her “rears and vices” joke in Mansfield Park. There is also a private letter where she makes a very embarrassingly bad dead baby joke. But these are highly atypical, and this public peeing scene feels so wrong for Anne Eliot: one of Austen’s more earnest and most loved heroines? 

And this brings me to the main problem with this adaptation which has been rubbished by the critiques and Janeites (Austen’s disciples and devotees): Anne Eliot is one of Austen’s most loved heroines and the film really needs to get this right . This is especially true for many Janeites who like the more mature romance narrative of mistakes, total estrangement for 7 years, torturous reconciliation and ultimately, second chances. Anne Eliot is probably a more interesting heroine to the youthful rollercoaster ride with Elizabeth Bennett. Unfortunately, this latest Frankenstein Anne Eliot is more like a SciFi time travelling Bridget Jones, teleported back into 19th Georgian society with an infinite supply of cheap red wine from the local supermarket. I like to think I'm pretty open-minded and enjoy radical perspectives and playful adaptions, but this Persuasion left me feeling distinctly discombobulated.

I don’t think this is all Dakota Johnson’s fault; she has great screen presence and style: a modern, sassy and sexy actress and fun to watch. Possibly a bit too much femme fatale. The script writing seems, and broader production seems largely responsible to me.

So what do I like about this adaptation? Well Austen’s novels also include a rich cast of minor characters: many of which provide comic relief and many of these are very well and pretty faithfully portrayed. 

At the London Jane Austen bookclub discussion (online this month) there was a lot of praise for Marry Musgrove and Sir Walter Eliot. I particularly like Lady Russel and Lady Darlrympe.

I also quite liked Captain Wentworth, he is a bit too present in this adaptation but well played by xxx and the tearful open scene of this film was beautifully played by DK and xx, my very first reaction to the film was : “well I would marry him!”, not a bad start for a Jane Austen film.

So like the Bride of Frankenstein, this Persuasion is entertaining but not in the same league as the original.


discombobulated [ dis-kuhm-bob-yuh-leyt ]

Informal. to confuse or disconcert; confound; bewilder:

The speaker was completely discombobulated by the hecklers.


Saturday, July 30, 2022

RIP Edana & Glen, long live the Rainbow Chorus!

 

It's 5am on Saturday morning, I just woke up, and I'm probably still slightly drunk, and the cats are delighted to see me. My cats love it when I wake up early and allow them into the bedroom for cuddles (I have a strict no-cats policy during deep sleep).

Unfortunately, while the cats are licking my face and demanding cuddles, the Facebook updates on my phone was heartbreaking news, 

Edana’s partner, Heather, and all the family are so sorry to have to tell you of Edana’s untimely death, late on Wednesday night, here in her beloved Liguria. Edana asked us to respect her privacy in dealing with her devastating cancer diagnosis, so we know that this will be a shock to many of you. Edana would have wanted you to remember her as we all do: the passionate, vivacious woman of style, love, joy, song, curiosity and furious politics. For those in Italy, the funeral will be held in Pugliola tomorrow, Saturday 16th July at 11am, at La Chiesa Parrocchiale di Santa Lucia in Pugliola, and afterwards at the Narbostro cemetery. 

Two weeks have now passed, and I still feel a sense of mourning for Edana and another lost connection to Brighton's Rainbow Chorus, an LGBTQIA+  choir still going strongly.

Although I didn't know that Edana well, I felt a strong affinity to her. We had been Facebook friends for over 15 years, and we occasionally chatted, but in 2010 I moved from Brighton to Amsterdam, and I hadn't seen Edana in person for a very long time.

I knew Edana through choir, Brighton Rainbow Chorus, both Edana and I joined when the choir was relatively small (rehearsals with 5-10 people) and overtime it grew until the typical rehearsal was 20-30. 

I was fortunate I first got know Edana as a fun-loving, friendly, vivacious lesbian with a great jazz voice. She had such a beautiful singing voice. It was only quite a lot later that I learnt she was from a "famous family" (two of her brothers are famous movie directors/producers?).

Her sister is also a famous Anglican and OBE, she also gave this great interview to Church Times:

Loretta Minghella became the First Church Estates Commissioner in November 2017, succeeding Sir Andreas Whittam Smith.
Before arriving at Church House, she was chief executive of Christian Aid for seven and a half years, and before that, she headed up the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, a job she says got “very rocky indeed” when the 2008 financial crisis hit.
Our Editor Paul Handley spoke to Loretta Minghella about how her experience prepared her for this latest role, and how the Commissioners are pressuring companies to improve their record on climate change and executive pay, among other things.

https://soundcloud.com/user-632063010/loretta-minghella-first-church-estates-commissioner-ep-51  

I vividly remember listening to this about 5 years ago and being soo impressed with Loretta, plus a brilliant interview with Paul Handley.

I was looking forward to meeting Edana again and telling her about my progress with singing (I've been having lessons for about 5 years now, which has been worth every penny i.e. I love singing. I also wanted to tell Edana about my admiration for her sister.

The last time I saw Edana perform was a memorable occasion in the upper room The Grand Central, Brighton (the closest pub in Brighton Station); not a very grand venue but it was a lot of fun.

It was an off-beat cabaret, foreshadowing the upcoming era of Tory austerity portraited in a perverse SM style. I believe Edwina both wrote and performed all the music, so was not prancing around in SM gear. My only disappointment is that I did get to hear Edwina sing on that occasion.

Over the last two weeks, I've also been thinking about Glenn: a very accomplished musician and quite often the accompanists (piano) for the Rainbow Chorus. Glenn passed away a few of years ago - equally heartbreaking.

I watched Glen perform on many occasions in the UK and in Greece. He was a sensitive accompanist and wonderful pianist with a particular passion for Rachmaninov.

A little over nine years ago, Glen and I met through our mutual friend the composer Matthew Pollard. Matt and I were collaborating on a project that was to become This Concert Will Fall In Love With You — later recorded with additional material as the CD Clameur and Glen was Matt’s first choice to play piano. Matt and Glen had were old friends, performing together in the Tacet Ensemble and The Rainbow Chorus for example.

https://peterkenny.co.uk/tag/glen-capra/

 
RIP Edana and Glenn and long live the Rainbow Chorus!

Sunday, July 10, 2022

The end of BJ but maybe not the bonkers brexiteers


This is from an email thread with my aunt from Jan 2021 (about 18 months ago), I was lamenting the corruption in the current government:

...this government is suffering from too many nasty scandals: the FT had good coverage Robert Jenrick / Richard Desmond scandal, which is a real stinker. However the Track and Trace scandal is even bigger and more serious, there were headlines of "consultants" charging up to 700 GBP/day for a system running off an Excel spreadsheet!? This came to light because they lost data for a huge number of registered covid cases from their spreadsheet-based application, the media focused on that they were running on a serious out-of-date version of Excel. 

I don't follow UK politics that closely now: I'm an ex-pat of 12+ years (and about to move from The Netherlands to Spain).

Plus, the UK news is also so depressing; I still fail to see any upside of Brexit; after 6 years, it seems to be a lose-lose-lose situation?

I was visiting my parents in Oct 2021 and caught this shocking story on the BBC1 panorama program

Pandora Papers: Questions over Tory donations by ex-Russian minister's wife
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-58711151

Major Tory donor advised on Uzbekistan deal later found to be $220m bribe
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/04/major-tory-donor-advised-on-uzbekistan-deal-later-found-to-be-bribe-mohamed-amersi

Apparently, senior Tories (including one ex-Prime Minister) have been knowingly courting money from highly dubious sources, something the opposition has been trying to highlight for some time 

The public has a right to know which government ministers are meeting with donors who have access to the corridors of power, including what appears to be exclusive access to the prime minister and the chancellor. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/aug/01/labour-calls-on-tories-to-reveal-which-ministers-met-elite-donors-club

Even the more traditional right FT has headlines like "Kremlin ties to 'Londongrad' need to be cut":

Even US officials are reportedly dismayed about the potential of “Londongrad” to derail western efforts. The current Conservative government has come under scrutiny for ties to donors such as the wife of Putin’s former deputy finance minister…
https://www.ft.com/content/33b71405-4885-4bce-8215-9b6e05543919

In the end, it was a sex-pest scandal which brought down BJ, who allegedly has his own problematic history? However, what did for BJ, was that:

(a) he knowingly appointed Mr Pincher (aka "Pincher by name, Pincher by nature" - BJ's sick humour and an epically bad joke with hindsight?

(b) the BJ told another bare-faced lie about not knowing of Mr Pincher's historical behavioural problems after he was caught red-handed again! The BJ lies backfired again: the cabinet initially rallied around their leader and went out to defend BJ, only to find they had been badly misled by BJ.

This was the final straw and then over about 48 hours, there was an extreme number of cabinet resignations i.e. as predicted last month, the Tory backbenchers had sent a clear signal they wanted BJ out, and it was up to the cabinet now…

However, a Dutch friend asked me 

I suppose you are celebrating now Johnson is out. I hope England has learnt its lesson regarding populist politicians, at least for a few generations. I hope England and UK will get some sense back in power. 

and my less than 100% optimistic response

I hope so too. But honestly I suspect the next PM will be another crazy Brexiteer. Could hardly be more odious than BJ but might be more effective and harder right wing politics, think Thatcher. But hopefully the Conservative party will see some sense?

 

I don't really believe in great men theories and the great men of history; apparently, Boris Johnson is a fan of this worldview (apparently his fascination with the "great men of history theory" was formed by his classics studies at Oxford?). As I can tell, it takes powerful teams of people working very well together to build something great, but unfortunately, only a handful of fools to tear all this good work down?

Honestly, I suspect that BJ will be mostly remembered for a mixture of toxic masculinity and corruption...

toxic masculinity 

The concept of toxic masculinity is used in academic and media discussions of masculinity to refer to certain cultural norms that are associated with harm to society and men themselves. Traditional stereotypes of men as socially dominant, along with related traits such as misogyny and homophobia,   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxic_masculinity 


corruption | kəˈrʌpʃ(ə)n | noun [mass noun] 1 dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery: the journalist who wants to expose corruption in high places. 
the action or effect of making someone or something morally depraved: the corruption of youth was a powerful motif | the word 'addict' conjures up evil and corruption. 

Saturday, June 25, 2022

Homage to Nora - Concluding Joyce's Triumphant Tale of Heroes with Penelope aka Molly Bloom

Molly Bloom, is the main female voice in Joyce's Ulysses, finishing off the epic tale in her own more intimate style.

Joyce's Ulysses has three main protagonists, we start with the brilliant but moody Stephen Delgas, then we enter Bloom's world which is more stable & mature.

Fortunately, our anti-hero Bloom is no prig, he is worldly wise and can still enjoy earthly pleasures, he even embraces the infantile: one of the surprises of Ulysses is how much you learn about his bowel movements throughout Bloom's day!

But the last words go to Molly (Mrs Bloom), there is something wonderfully touching about her long and sometimes rambling monologue. She goes from melancholy to romance, to excitement, to disobedience, to finally reconciliation and love.  

Many essays and even whole books have been written about how Joyce based his fictional heroine on his mistress Nora Barnacle (much later became Nora Joyce), who Joyce absolutely worshipped. 

Nora Barnacle (21 March 1884 – 10 April 1951) was the muse and wife of Irish author James Joyce.

"Well, Jim, I haven't read any of your books but I'll have to someday because they must be good considering how well they sell."

Dictionary of Quotations, p. 452, To her husband James Joyce, Recalled on her death, 12 April 1951

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Nora_Barnacle

Joyce was madly in love with Nora, and his ideas were extremely progressive in 1922 and some still are radical in 2022.

Although Joyce was recognised as a literary genius in his own lifetime and he never got delusions of grandeur and never attempted to become a saint. I think he understood human frailty & imperfectability at a very deep level, and that is why I expect he wasn't deluded by his literary genius status?

Getting back to Joyce's muse, one of Nora Barnacle's currently more popular and funny quotes

 "What do you think ... of a book with a big, fat, horrible married woman as the heroine?"

I feel I've heard this multiple times in 2022, and it shows plenty of wit if a bit harsh.

The main goodreads quote for Nora is also very funny

“I go to bed and then that man sits in the next room and continues laughing about his own writing. And then I knock at the door, and I say, now Jim, stop writing or stop laughing.” 

https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/6884195.Nora_Barnacle

  

So the closing words Ulysses goto Molly, based on Penelope, and I believe this more carnal and femine section is what excited Marilyn Monroe, who can still be seen reading Ulysses, the internet is awash with images like this 






Penelope (/pəˈnɛləpiː/ pə-NEL-ə-pee; Greek: Πηνελόπεια, Pēnelópeia, or Greek: Πηνελόπη, Pēnelópē) is a character in Homer's Odyssey. She was the queen of Ithaca and was the daughter of Spartan king Icarius and naiad Periboea. Penelope is known for her fidelity to her husband Odysseus, despite the attention of more than a hundred suitors during his absence.





Thursday, June 16, 2022

What did Shaw think of Ulysses, behind the mock horror he loved it!

George Bernard Shaw (Nobel prize 1925 and author of Pygmalion, which was adapted into the iconic musical My Fair Lady) wrote in an early review to Sylvia Beach (the publisher & owner of the Paris-based Shakespeare & Company) these very funny lines:

‘It is a revolting record of a disgusting phase of civilisation; but it is a truthful one; and I should like to put a cordon-round Dublin; round up every male person in it between the ages of 15 and 30; force them to read it; and ask them whether on reflection they could see anything amusing in all that fouled mouthed, foul minded derision and obscenity. 

Clearly, there is more than a hint of mock horror, Shaw does seem to be both shocked and intrigued. He will of appreciated that his more mainstream audience would have expected him to disapprove of this banned work. 

But also Shaw clearly sees the literary merit:

To you, possibly, it may appeal as art: you are probably (you see I don’t know you) a young barbarian – beglamoured by the-excitements and enthusiasms that art stirs up in passionate material; but to me it is all hideously real: I have walked those streets and know those shops and have heard-and taken part in those conversations...’

https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/letter-from-george-bernard-shaw-responding-to-james-joyces-ulysses

Apparently Shaw much later (1939 and well after the British and US bans had been lifted) publicly conceded that Joyce was a literary genius: "Ulysses as a masterpiece". The British Library also mentions that Joyce loved the original notariety

Shaw’s response highly amused Joyce, and he had this copy made to share with Weaver. Shaw’s original copy of the prospectus is also held by the British Library.

So what did Shaw first think of Ulysses, behind the mock horror of the banned book, it seems to me that he was also entranced and in awe of Ulysses. 

To be honest, while we are probably a lot harder to shock in 2022 than 1922, but there are parts of the book I am still a bit icky to read? Not the sexual content and sexual fantasy, which are both fascinating and highly entertaining, but mostly Joyce's characters' private lives are quite sensitively and compelling told. 

My problem with Joyce is the reoccurring references to his various bowel problems... I struggle a bit with musical farting, Joyce does seem to be appealing to the frat-boy market? 

Still in the name of openness, that is okay, just not to my taste... his S&M fantasy seems pretty hardcore too, plus that is pure fantasy, unfortunately, I fear Joyce (and many Dubliners) really did have a lot of bowel problems in 1922?




Karsh captures Shaw as a great thinker and granddaddy of the  Fabian Society (a more liberal, social democratic form of socialism).

I was once lucky enough, in the summer of 1989, to attend a lecture in Ottawa by this legendary Canadian portrait photographer. I was taken away by the exhibition while backpacking across North America and decided to stay a few extra days in Ottawa (a fine city, although the hostel I was staying in was a converted prison and the noise at night was terrible... another story), too catch Karsh's public lecture.

Sunday, June 5, 2022

Joyce's great European novel and that queer fellow in Barcelona

I've been dipping in and out of Joyce's Ulysses for the last six months.

While the original text is sometimes a bit hard to follow,  with Joyce's "mischievous and obscurantist style", it is also incredibly rich and really grows on you.

Also, there are now a wealth of resources to mark it more accessible, from reading guides, an unabridged radio play version (free thanks to RTE) and university lecture courses (which you can now follow online)... 

Once you get into Ulysses it is a very rich world, and one of the commentators was discussing that every time they read (three times over 25 years?) it means something different to them. This got me thinking: what stands out to me?

A few months ago, I wrote a short piece about the connection to Amsterdam and in particular to Spinoza, whom Bloom, with his Irish-Jewish background is a fan of Spinoza. I can see this and feel this connection to Amsterdam and Spinoza, as I've been living in Amsterdam for the last 12 years, my grandparents on my mother's side were Hungarian Jews, who after World War II ended up as refugees in Amsterdam. I'm also a fan of Spinoza and his focus on the cultural element of religion and his campaigning for greater toleration of different cultural and religious practices.

Interesting it turns out that Molly Bloom also has a vague Irish-Jewish background, being born in Gibtrala to a Jewish mother, Lunita Laredo who is mentioned briefly by name in Molly's soliloquy  

$ cat -n Ulysses-Jame-Joyce-1922.txt | grep -B2 -A2 Lunita
 32041 wouldnt go mad about either or suppose I divorced him Mrs Boylan my
 32042 mother whoever she was might have given me a nicer name the Lord knows
 32043 after the lovely one she had Lunita Laredo the fun we had running along
 32044 Williss road to Europa point twisting in and out all round the other
 32045 side of Jersey they were shaking and dancing about in my blouse like

this is very much towards the end of the book (line 32043 out of 32856), just before Molly's climactic ending and Bloom's homecoming,  and I believe emotional reconciliation with Molly ...

 32851 red yes and how he kissed me under the Moorish wall and I thought well
 32852 as well him as another and then I asked him with my eyes to ask again
 32853 yes and then he asked me would I yes to say yes my mountain flower and
 32854 first I put my arms around him yes and drew him down to me so he could
 32855 feel my breasts all perfume yes and his heart was going like mad and
 32856 yes I said yes I will Yes.
 32857
 32858 Trieste-Zurich-Paris
 32859

One of the recurring themes in Ulysses which stands out to me in 2022 (my first reading) is that it is a very European novel

  1021 —After all, I should think you are able to free yourself. You are your
  1022 own master, it seems to me.
  1023
  1024 —I am a servant of two masters, Stephen said, an English and an
  1025 Italian.
  1026
  1027 —Italian? Haines said.
  1028
  1029 A crazy queen, old and jealous. Kneel down before me.
  1030
  1031 —And a third, Stephen said, there is who wants me for odd jobs.
  1032
  1033 —Italian? Haines said again. What do you mean?
  1034
  1035 —The imperial British state, Stephen answered, his colour rising, and
  1036 the holy Roman catholic and apostolic church.

There aren't too many British-English characters, Haines is a racist fool:

  1065  —Of course I’m a Britisher, Haines’s voice said, and I feel as one. I
  1066  don’t want to see my country fall into the hands of German jews either.
  1067  That’s our national problem, I’m afraid, just now.

While Deasy is Irish, apparently he can describe as a "West Briton"

The more hardcore Irish nationalists of the era saw West Brits like Mr. Deasy as traitors and heretics. https://www.bloomsandbarnacles.com/blog/2018/12/24/deasy-of-west-britain

and he is another racist fool, with probably the worst joke in the whole of Ulysses

  1845 —I just wanted to say, he said. Ireland, they say, has the honour of
  1846 being the only country which never persecuted the jews. Do you know
  1847 that? No. And do you know why?
  1848
  1849 He frowned sternly on the bright air.
  1850
  1851 —Why, sir? Stephen asked, beginning to smile.
  1852
  1853 Because she never let them in, Mr Deasy said solemnly.
  1854
  1855 A coughball of laughter leaped from his throat dragging after it a
  1856 rattling chain of phlegm. He turned back quickly, coughing, laughing,

one of my favourite of Bloom's lines is "There was a fellow I knew once in Barcelona, queer fellow"

  2155 irlandais, nous, Irlande, vous savez ah, oui!_ She thought you wanted a
  2157 Postprandial. There was a fellow I knew once in Barcelona, queer

  2158 fellow, used to call it his postprandial. Well: _slainte!_ Around the
  2159 slabbed tables the tangle of wined breaths and grumbling gorges. His
  2160 breath hangs over our saucestained plates, the green fairy’s fang
  2156 cheese _hollandais_. Your postprandial, do you know that word?


obviously, Joyce meant queer as in the eccentric and not in the full LGBTQ sense, but I still like the double-entendre here and it intrigues me what happened to this query man in Barcelona:
* just why and in what way(s) was he a bit (or very) queer?
* also as far as a I can tell, our queer friend in Barcelona doesn't pop up anywhere else in Ulysses?  

Still from the extracts above, it seems to me that Joyce was absolutely in favour of greater European integration and toleration (religious toleration and seeing religion as a cultural tradition are major themes in Bloom's intellectual idol Spinoza, a 17th century Amsterdam Jewish philosopher).

This from another key moment in Ulysses, Bloom's argument with the citizen

 16781  Alf and Joe at him to whisht and he on his high horse about the jews
 16782  and the loafers calling for a speech and Jack Power trying to get him
 16783  to sit down on the car and hold his bloody jaw and a loafer with a
 16784  patch over his eye starts singing _If the man in the moon was a jew,
 16785  jew, jew_ and a slut shouts out of her:
 16786
 16787  —Eh, mister! Your fly is open, mister!
 16788
 16789  And says he:
 16790
 16791  —Mendelssohn was a jew and Karl Marx and Mercadante and Spinoza. And
 16792  the Saviour was a jew and his father was a jew. Your God.
 16793
 16794  —He had no father, says Martin. That’ll do now. Drive ahead.
 16795
 16796  —Whose God? says the citizen.



The Citizen, is an Irish nationalist and another racist ...

The Citizen is a character encountered by Leopold Bloom in Barney Kiernan's pub in the Cyclops episode of Ulysses (episode 12). He is to be found in said pub with his everpresent dog, Garryowen, whom he speaks to in Irish. When Leopold Bloom enters the pub, he is berated by the Citizen, who is a fierce Fenian and anti-Semite. The episode ends with Bloom reminding the Citizen that his Saviour was a Jew. As Bloom leaves the pub, the Citizen, in anger, throws a biscuit tin at Bloom's head, but misses. The chapter is marked by extended tangents made outside the voice of the unnamed narrator: hyperboles of legal jargon, Biblical passages, Irish mythology, etc. It is thought that the character of the Citizen may be based on Michael Cusack [Mícheál Ó Cíosóg], the founder of the GAA (Gaelic Athletic Association).

https://www.goodreads.com/characters/47073-the-citizen



So there seem to be a lot of anti-Semites in Joyce's Dublin, probably the one thing which would unite the odious Deasy, Hanes and Citizen? 

But the last word goes, to his wife Molly, who knows and loves her husband so deeply, including all Bloom's foibles and fancies 

 32318  Im let wait O Jesus wait yes that thing has come on me yes now wouldnt
 32319  that afflict you of course all the poking and rooting and ploughing he
 32320  had up in me now what am I to do Friday Saturday Sunday wouldnt that
 32321  pester the soul out of a body unless he likes it some men do God knows
 32322  theres always something wrong with us 5 days every 3 or 4 weeks usual
 32323  monthly auction isnt it simply sickening that night it came on me like
 32324  that the one and only time we were in a box that Michael Gunn gave him
 32325  to see Mrs Kendal and her husband at the Gaiety something he did about
 32326  insurance for him in Drimmies I was fit to be tied though I wouldnt
 32327  give in with that gentleman of fashion staring down at me with his
 32328  glasses and him the other side of me talking about Spinoza and his soul
 32329  thats dead I suppose millions of years ago I smiled the best I could
 32330  all in a swamp leaning forward as if I was interested having to sit it
 32331  out then to the last tag I wont forget that wife of Scarli in a hurry
 32332  supposed to be a fast play about adultery that idiot in the gallery
 32333  hissing the woman adulteress he shouted I suppose he went and had a







Monday, May 9, 2022

Amersfoort is een mooie en historische stad

Amersfoort is ongeveer een half uur met de trein van Amsterdam.

 



Amersfoort is een mooie en historische stad, met diverse bekende musea



 


Amersfoort heeft ook veel mooie straten and winkels en musea.


Tijdens de lockdown ben ik online lid geworden van de Amersfoortse boekenclub. 

Het eerste boek dat we lazen (in het Engels) was "The Life of Pi" van Yann Martel.

Nu is het leuk om de Amersfoort Boekenclub persoonlijk te ontmoeten.



 

 


De  Amersfoort Boekenclub praat natuurlijk over boeken, maar ze hebben ook feestjes, verkleedfeestjes met make-up